Home health struggle

Hey team, sitting here in the office with snow falling, drinking a Booker’s and thinking about writing something.

Being a home health PT is awesome. The flexibility, the hours, every day looks different, getting to be out and see things every day. I really love it. But, it is different.

I have been trying to articulate how it is different (from outpatient) for a while and there are the obvious things you would think of: older patients, less differential diagnosis, more basic interventions, etc. But I think the thing that has been most pressing and honestly frustrating lately is the sheer amount of patients that are not good candidates for PT at all.

So any PT evaluation/ initial encounter the question “Am I the right person for the patient to be in front of?” is relevant but in outpatient the answer is almost always an easy yes. So any type of medical screening is quick and then you are off to the races.

Home health on the other hand is completely different. Sometimes the majority of initial interaction with the patient is spent trying to answer that question. And lately the answer has been no a lot of the time.

This is the hardest and most frustrating thing about home health to me. A lot of these patients have been examples of “kicking the can down the road” by medical providers upstream of home health and home health is where the can ends up.

In home health you have to have your medical screening and your “feelers” out way more than I ever realized because a large majority of these patients are not safe or ready for PT, even though they are sitting in front of you.

You’re Deranged

You just had images of a guy trying to pay for his coffee with a sock or vacuuming his front yard.

Most people would be offended by being called deranged. Being deranged, to normal people in society, means that you are a crazy person. So, obviously you don’t want to be called that.

But in the world of musculoskeletal medicine it means something entirely different and it usually is a great thing.

Let’s talk abou this.

A super smart PT named Robin McKenzie figured out after years and years of “tinkering” and being honest with himself that there is a whole category of aches and pains that no one had ever really defined. And it is the most common category of aches in pains that us humans have to deal with during our lives. He named this category the derangement.

So what the heck is it?

Derangement Syndrome is a clinical presentation which demonstrates Directional Preference in response to loading strategies and is typically associated with movement loss.

If you are confused right now, join the masses of PTs, chiropractors, orthopedic surgeons, med school students, PT school students, nurses and other health care people who have no clue that this even exists. But remember, this is the MOST common category of musculoskeletal pain.

I think it’s helpful to think about what a derangement is NOT sometimes. A derangement is not a part of your body, or even a specific pathology (like tear, or contusion for example) but it is a clinical presentation. A derangement can not (necessarily) be seen on x-ray or MRI. It is essential a description of what happens to your pain when you do certain things. Specific things.

You are probably still confused. And that is ok. The important thing to realize is that if I or another PT that thinks like Robin McKenzie say you have a derangement it is great news.

Derangements get better, and they get better fast usually.

How do you know if you have a derangement? Well, that’s where its probably helpful to see a PT who knows about this stuff, but here are some things to look for.

Example:

Let’s say your elbow hurts. If you bend it as far as it will go 10 times, does it feel better, no? Try the other way, straightening it as far as it will go 10 times. If it starts to make your pain go away or reduce as we McKenzie nerds would say, then you may have a derangement. The key here is the as far as it will go part. Be slow and listen to your body but try to move the joint as far as it will go.

If symptoms improve and last then you may have a derangement. It really can be that simple, if you know what to look for.

So next time you get called deranged by me don’t be offended, unless you are vacuuming your front yard.

The Miracle of Adaptation

This morning my kids were crazy people. There must be a full moon or something because they were more werewolves than people. Just crying a lot and fighting, generally being stressful. And it really was a stressful morning. A stressful stimulus.

My wife was more in the middle of it than I was, I was doing dishes and getting my work day started and all the sudden she came in at her wit’s end, teary-eyed. She said “I just can’t be in there [the playroom] anymore.” Next the two youngest ran out screaming “WHERE’S MOM!!!???”

It was just a lot.

After we calmed the storm and I left the house to start my day, I pondered the morning. Why did that go so badly? Why do things go badly sometimes? Why doesn’t God make life easy?

What’s this got to do with Adaptation?

Well, I have been thinking a lot about strength training lately. The stress to the body, or stimulus. The rest and adaptation that happens to heal and allow for more load next session. Without the stimulus there is no adaptation in the world of strength training. These thoughts are bouncing around my head as I ponder the difficulties of the morning and it hit me.

Maybe the stress, recover, adapt model is not just for physical change? Maybe this is how all change in life happens?

What if God, wanting to “strengthening us (our character, our patience, our joy, our reliance on him)” provides a stimulus, allows us to recover and facilitates the desired adaptation?

For a stimulus to be helpful in strength training it has to be “recoverable” or in other words, it cannot to be so stressful that excessive damage is done to the system. I think life is like this sometimes. I think the stresses of life can be excessive and can damage the system.

But like our bodies, small and calculated stimuli over time with proper recovery make those previously damaging stresses very doable or even easy.

In life there are equivalents to being hydrated, eating enough calories generally (and protein specifically) and sleeping enough. These are the factors that affect physical recovery. If these are dialed in, you will recover. In life, these things are more subtle. Maybe time with friends, time alone, laughing, going outside, watching a movie are the things that our emotional and spiritual selves need to rest and being in the Word is the “nutrition” that we need to recover from the stimuli around us.

These are new thoughts and half-baked ones but I feel that there are some principles at play. Maybe our characters are being strengthened and the hard times are actually intended to be useful stresses.

Capacity vs. Specificity

2 approaches with different aims.

One’s goal is to make people capable or generally well-rounded at everything and one is to make people excellent at one or a few things. Which is better?

 

This discussion mirrors the Crossfit vs. sports-specific or adaptation specific conversation. In physical therapy school and in my CSCS training EVERYTHING was geared around causing specific adaptations in our clients, or even more zoomed in, our client’s tissues. If they came in with shoulder pain the goal was to figure out what specific tissue was the issue and cause adaptation specifically at that tissue. Or in the CSCS world, you have a middle linebacker that needs to be able to cover 40 yards in 4.5 seconds and be able to bring down someone that is 215 pounds. Specific demands require specific training stimuli. Right? As you can imagine I was very on the specific side of things and ended up not really liking nor understanding Crossfit/the capacity side of things.

Then I started practicing. And seeing real people. Dads with 3 kids. Mom’s who are busy. Young professionals who just want to be healthy. Older people that want to stay mobile.

What I started to see what that 99% of humans walking around did not need some very specific stimulus to meet their goals, but actually the opposite. They need to be more capable humans. Instead of getting an A+ on sprinting or vertical leap, they need to get a B in everything.

And my Crossfit hate started to break down slowly. Why would you ever program 10 reps of squat snatch, double under (jump rope twice per jump instead of once), and running all in a 15-minute workout? Squat snatches are a power developing movement, only to be done in very small sets with moderate load quickly with full rest…right? Jump rope is an aerobic endurance exercise, don’t pair that with a power development movement, then running! Noooo this is all wrong.

Or is it. What happens to the average human body when exposed to all of these different stimuli (when performed with proper technique of course). They become more capable humans. Their endurance improves, their power improves, their strength improves. The concept of concurrent training (training strength and endurance simultaneously) is typically bashed by the strength and condition world, but they are in a different world then most of the normal humans walking around.

That is the big difference. Most people, me included, want to be fit and able to do what life throws at me. I don’t care to be great at any specific thing but I want to be able to do it all at a high level if necessary. That is why I am now firmly in the creating capable humans camp. Come join me.

 

**Side note: these camps can play nice together and specific training can be incorporated into a Crossfit style program to target client-specific goals.

What is freedom?

What is Freedom and why do I talk about it?

Good old Webster tells me “1 : the quality or state of being free: such as. a : the absence of necessity, coercion, or constraint in choice or action.”

This is pretty overarching so we will go with it. The absence of necessity, coercion or constraint in choice or action. There are a lot of areas of life that freedom is lived out, or sadly not lived out in. Financial freedom is one that comes to mind.

As a physical therapist, especially in home health, I get to see first hand everyday the glaring lack of freedom so many people live with. They are slaves to their previous bad choices, current predicaments, and often times poor health that is completely outside of their control. They aren’t free.

While some of these people are physically constrained in one way or another, whether it is simply getting tired more quickly than they wish, or they have non-weight bearing restrictions from a recent fracture, MANY are constrained by fear.

The fear of falling, the fear of a certain movement, the fear of getting sick, the fear of….fill in the blank. Many of these people aren’t free because they are thinking about a situation wrongly and they are enslaved by their fear.

You may be thinking, why is this physical therapist, strength/conditioning guy talking about this? Good question because I feel like we don’t talk about it enough. It shouldn’t be weird. The reason I am passionate about getting people strong and free is because oftentimes people in my profession/position are actually part of the problem.

 

Why are you afraid of going down your stairs? Well…I might fall

Why are you wearing that knee brace? Well…my doctor told me my knee is bone on bone and would give out.

Why are you afraid to lift your “dog” (insert 7 pound chihuahua)? Well….my physical therapist/chiro/trainer told me I have a slipped disc.

 

These are the conversations I am having with people all day long. These are smart people, many of them have been on this earth for 2-3 times as long as I have and they have been made to fear their bodies and their world.

This is the reason I want to inspire people to be free.

90% of this is not the load I select (10% is though…don’t under load people in home health)

90% of this is how I talk to these people.

People want to be free. It’s time to help them understand that they are robust (mentally and physically) or to use Webster’s words un-constrain them.

 

Why I moved to Home Health

It has been a year already since I moved from a private practice outpatient clinic to a larger hospital system’s home health agency and I love it. This move was not easy for me because my previous job was incredible. Great people, fun environment, and very much a petri dish for my clinical practice. But I had to change. There’s a few reasons

  1. Flexibility
  2. Finances
  3. Family
  4. Broader clinical experience

Flexibility

My wife woke up sick one day and instead of leaving at 7 and wishing her luck or having to take off work. I checked my schedule planned to start seeing patients at noon and was still able to get home before 5, finished with patient care, just needing to polish up some notes. My kids’ daycare had a father’s day event from 10-12. As you may have guessed most father’s (paying for daycare) are working from 10-12 so there were not many there. I saw a patient before and then some patients after…simple as that. The flexibility of home health is truly wonderful. If you get your work done that everyone is happy.

 

Finances

Home health pays better. In some places much better. Simple put. There are also some benefits to working for a non-profit including the Public Service Loan Forgiveness Program, but that’s another post for another day.

 

Family

At the time of writing this I have a 4-year-old, a 2-year-old and a 7 month old. The previous 2 points also made sense for the family, but there is something else on this point. In school and when I first started practicing physical therapy was constantly on my mind. I was reading blogs, on Twitter, constantly learning and engaging with other PTs around the world, wanting to be known. And, while it was fun and probably made me a better PT it was ultimately unhealthy for me personally, spiritually and for the family. Home health has helped me put work in its place. A place where I still feel very passionate about what I do, and continue to strive to be great at it but 3 or 4 or 5th in life.

 

Broader clinical experience

Home health has given me exposure to much more than orthopedic/musculoskeletal pathologies….MUCH more. And with that my reasoning model and clinical decision-making has had to get bigger…MUCH bigger. For example, in the clinic I mostly assumed that the person was supposed to be getting physical therapy treatment, that their life was otherwise in relatively good shape and we just needed to fix the pain they were in. In home health sometimes physical therapy is the least of the persons concerns and because they are sitting in front of me it is my job to figure out what they need. Social work? OT? Placement in SNF or assisted living? Hospice? These are large-scale, whole person problems that take larger reasoning models than what tissue is the issue. It has made me a better PT.

 

I really enjoy being in home health and plan to do it for a while. If you have questions let me know.

McKenzie Part A: After thoughts

I went to McKenzie (or the Mechanical Diagnosis and Therapy aka MDT) Part A: Lumbar Spine course the last weekend of July in St. Louis, so I have had some time to wrestle with and implement some the things I learned. Overall, the course was impressive, comprehensive, and very practical. I have been a fan of the method for a number of reasons for a while but I finally got some official teaching.

Overall Score: 4+/5

Practicality: 5/5

EBP: 5/5

Marketability: 3/5

Practicality:

The McKenzie course is geared towards teaching the information so that you can “use it on Monday.” The method itself is really easy to start implementing because it is a clinical reasoning framework more than a technique, which take time to develop into something that is useful and effective. Side note, when I took the IAOM shoulder course in 2016 that was one of my biggest complaints/frustrations. I felt like I needed months or even years of practice to “master” the techniques presented at the course, so really it wasn’t very helpful “on Monday.” The McKenzie part A course was the opposite. The framework is presented clearly and they brought it real patients for the instructor to treat so that “the method” is tested and on display for everyone.

 

EBP:

The low back pain literature and the low back pain world is a messy one. There is a lot of dogma, there are some gurus and there are a million different ways people treat it. It can be pretty daunting and frustrating. The good thing about MDT is that it somewhat tried and true, especially compared to some other treatment paradigms. Centralization is one of the more well documented findings in conservative musculoskeletal medicine and the MDT system has been around so long it just has a larger body of research behind it than most. MDT’s effectiveness in the lumbar spine is well documented (compared to other approaches), it incorporates patient’s values and individuality into the system and clinician experience is directed with the method to make more systematic/ logical decisions more quickly. However, the course presentation was not a literature review by any means. The focus of the course was on the system and how to implement it well, they gave you the resources to look at the evidence. Compared to the BFR course which seemed to be 80% defending the concepts from literature followed by 20% how to do it.

 

Marketability:

This is a tough one. I gave it a 3/5 because there are plenty of stories of physicians and patients seeking out MDT providers, it’s just not the norm. The fact that I have completed Part A means nothing to most people. Without going on too much of a rant I think my thoughts on this have changed over the last few years. MDT may not perk up the ears of the average consumer of physical therapy, chiropractic, massage, whatever BUT it does make me more effective at treating people with back pain. Being good at the service to provide is useful when marketing, especially if you can track your outcomes.

 

My 2 cents:

There are other systems out there, some of them are good. Most people (physical therapists) don’t use a system to organize their clinical decisions but just collective “tools” and put them in a toolbox over time. Imagine a toolbox that has 50 things in it but they are all piled on top of each other, no organization whatsoever. That is what most physical therapists are working with. MDT is the toolbox. It’s organized, simple, logical, effective, patient-centered, active, reliable, safe, well researched and applies to the whole body. To me that’s a win.

I already signed up for Part B: Cervical and Thoracic spine in October 2018…review to come.

 

Should You See a Chiropractor Too?

This is a sensitive subject for most physical therapists and chiropractors. Depending on who you ask chiropractors are either magic workers that can pop the pain right out of things or they are quacks. In my experience there are very few people who fall between these two extremes.

Love them or hate them, I don’t really care. I’m not going to say that an entire profession is good or bad, that is never true. There are fantastic physical therapists and there are terrible ones, the same is true for dentists, physicians, nurses, and certainly chiropractors. I think as a whole the philosophy of chiropractors is different from mine, and I obviously think I’m great so I would tend to disagree with that philosophy. However, I don’t think that differences in philosophy are enough to call someone a quack…unless they actually are. If you want to know my thoughts on a specific provider based on accurate information that you can provide me I will happily give you that in private. 😉

Now to the question at hand, which is one I get often in one form or another Can I see a chiropractor while I’m seeing you? or should I keep going to my chiropractor? My answer to this is for the most part situational but in principle my answer is usually something along the lines of “It really isn’t good science for you to be trying too many things at once to try to make (fill in the pathology/symptoms) better. If you are seeing me, then going to a chiropractor, then getting a massage, then doing Tai chi, then taking a bath in Icy Hot and you come back to me hurting more I have no clue what to blame.” In my mind, it is best to bring as much clarity to someone’s pain/dysfunction/etc. as possible in order to help them efficiently and effectively. SO in short I don’t love when my patients are getting treatment from more than one place BUT this is situational. The main reason I would be ok with “co-treating” is to build a relationship with that provider.

Hope that answers that question.

 

A Letter to My Patients

Dear Patients,

Over the last year at Premiere PT we got to hang out. We got to know each other. We got to make fun of Sanders together. We grew together. And (I’d like to say) most of you got better and are back to doing what you love.

But I have to move on. I have taken a job in home health with Mercy in order to allow flexibility for our family as we bring a new little one into this world.

You have taught me more than I have taught you and I really appreciate it. I will keep serving this community just in a different way and a different set of people.

I want to personally thank you for the fun we’ve had and the opportunity to let me into your world at a time that you were feeling pretty low.

I’m still in NWA running, playing, parenting youths and being a spaz in general so feel free to reach out if you need anything at all. I will also be back to bother the crew at Premiere probably more than they want.

 

Sincerely,

Zack

“What do you think of CrossFit?”

This is probably one the questions I get most as a physical therapist, and I have now given enough thought to put it into a blog post.

My short answer is “I love it.” My long answer is below.

A few of my initial concerns with CrossFit were:

  1. It isn’t specific to any one goal
  2. It seems like an easy way to get hurt
  3. It seems like everyone does the same thing

Over the last several months though these concerns have actually be dispelled and/or properly understood.

Now these are the primary reasons I love CrossFit:

1. It isn’t specific

This has gone from a concern to something I actually appreciate about CrossFit. When I was studying for my CSCS certification I was immersed in program design, periodization and targeting specific adaptations in your clientele. CrossFit seemed like the total opposite of that. Doing high volumes of power lifting movements was the opposite of my training and I didn’t like it, until I started working as a physical therapist. Part of the paradigm shift for me came from this video from the founder of CrossFit, which essentially outlines the thinking behind all of it. CrossFit is not intended to make the athlete (or just human) specifically good at any one thing but to build the athlete’s CAPACITY. Instead of training to jump really high, or sprint really fast or lift really heavy or running really far, CrossFit trains you to perform more work. The non-specificity of CrossFit actually serves to improve the athlete’s ability to tolerate more activity, which is precisely what the average human needs. In the video, Glassman goes deeper into the topic of building fitness (or capacity) and how aiming at that goal will create not only fit people, but healthy people. I agree.

2. It seems like an easy way to get hurt

This belief stemmed from my misunderstanding of how almost all CrossFit gyms function. I thought that anyone could sign up and that day they would be doing full Rx (full weight on lifts) WODs (workout of the day). This seemed like a perfect design for injury. However, most “boxes” now have a fairly developed on-boarding process that participants are required to go through to start working out. Most of these include a communication of previous/current injuries, a movement analysis, and training on basic movements. Also, most gyms are diligent to scale WODs for less advanced people, or even have different class times for beginners. Sure people get injured doing CrossFit, just like people get injured doing any other athletic pursuit. This argument against CrossFit falls apart almost immediately for me. Does your risk of injury go up? Sure, compared to sitting on the couch, but not much more than trying to do any lifting/exercising on your own. Also, I will take occasional musculoskeletal aches and pains that can be treated effectively (by a PT, chiro, masseuse, etc.) in exchange for the [expensive] chronic, non-musculoskeletal diseases that come from being unhealthy. Heart disease, Type II diabetes and chronic respiratory diseases are considered preventable, building fit humans would help on this front. I’m a big believer in Mark Rippetoe’s quote “Strong people are harder to kill.” I think you could argue that long term exposure to CrossFit will decrease your risk of injury by building your overall tolerance to advanced movements and high loads.

3. Seems like everyone is doing the same thing.

This was another misunderstanding I had about CrossFit. As I mentioned above, WODs are scalable and good coaches will be able to help individuals meeting their needs with every workout. This is basically a non-issue for me. The point of CrossFit is to expose you to a continually variety of movements that you do with a group of people, under the supervision of a skilled coach (or coaches).

Overall, I love CrossFit. Building more capable humans, and more capable communities will help drive down the overall cost of healthcare.

 

Have a thoughts leave a comment and let’s chat!